In 2012, ripples were
sent through American society because of two momentous events: the Economist
Intelligence Unit released its report on international education performances
and the Newsroom premiered in the U.S. on June 24. Although ACN is not considered
a “real” news channel, the unit that released its controversial report on the
shape of a U.S. education was almost too real to be true when it ranked the
U.S. “17th in an assessment of the education systems of 50
countries, behind several Scandinavian and Asian nations” (Gayathri 1). Only
when the topic of education was shoved into the faces of American citizens, did
people generate questions. Only when the U.S. educational system ranked below
average on multiple global studies, did anyone even come to consider the
failure of American customs and culture. As history continues to repeat itself,
humans are consistently motivated to prevent impeding destruction only when
every single social assumption has been shattered and people have been ripped
from their ivory towers by active participants in society. Neil Postman is not
only one of those “active participants” who has been sounding alarms of social
decline since the 1970s, but his books (such as Amusing Ourselves to Death and The
End of Education) consistently succeed in opening the minds of his readers
to avoid the decline of the individual, one reader at a time. Postman’s book The End of Education is a recent
reminder that schools play an integral role in the use of an individual’s
identity to help improve society and individuals. Furthermore, Neil Postman
creates a unique position in education literature by identifying successful
narratives that will help motivate and develop students both inside and outside
of the classroom. However, even though the narratives that Postman identifies
are crucial parts of reforming the educational system, instituting these
narratives as solutions to the larger social problems that Postman identifies
himself with is an over-extension of his claim.
Initially,
Neil Postman’s claim can be observed as a valid and feasible solution to the
problems of the educational system. However, the spirit of Postman’s claim in The End of Education and Amusing Ourselves to Death entails that
Postman identifies his solutions with larger impacts in society as a whole.
Postman’s extension of his solutions to wider, societal impacts is dangerous in
that the intrusion of state-sponsored narratives directly into the social realm
only helps blind society of the cause of its problems. Unfortunately, Postman entrenches
himself deeply in this bio-political logic whenever he appeals exclusively to
public schools and the control of the state over them. Specifically, Postman
bases his logic off of state control when he reasons that:
Schools… are mirrors of social belief, giving back what citizens put in front of them. But they are not fixed in one position. They can be moved up and down and sideways, so that… they will reflect one thing and not another. But always they show something that is there, not of the schools’ invention, but of the society that pays for the schools. (Postman 60)
By basing his solutions off of the public—who
Postman portrays as easily influenced and manipulated by politicians and television
in Amusing Ourselves to Death—The End of Education only endorses a
band-aid solution to the larger problems facing society instead of engaging in
a direct confrontation with the power centers causing societal fragmentation.
However, The End of Education does
implicitly endorse a valid solution to larger societal problems that does
involve a confrontation with existing power structures. Postman makes a vague
but enlightening appeal to the solution of questioning when he states that:
Definitions, questions, metaphors—these are three of the most potent elements with which human language constructs a worldview. And in urging, as I do, that the study of these elements be given the highest priority in school, I am suggesting that world making through language is a narrative of power, durability, and inspiration. (Postman 175)
Therefore, the presentation of solutions that
Postman proposes is chronologically ineffective in solving the wider societal
problems that are mentioned in The End of
Education. A fundamental change in the way citizens view government should
be achieved first—with the help of widespread questioning, deliberation, and
participation in the political process—then, and only then could it be possible
to trust society with control over the incredibly powerful narratives Postman
endorses. Fortunately, the narratives used in schools have failed; with society distracted and manipulated by television and politicians, it has been a blessing in disguise that politicians have not been able to gain control over the power of narratives in public school.
Works
Cited
Gayathri,
Amrutha. “US 17th In Global Education Ranking; Finland, South Korea
Claim Top Spots” International Business Times 27 November
2012: 1. Web.
Postman, Neil. The
End of Education: Redefining the Value of School. New York: Vintage
Books, 1996. Print.
Some great points here--though I must say I do disagree with the notion that Postman's solutions serve as any sort of "band-aid." If anything, Postman raises a lot of difficult questions which cannot be fixed with simple first aid (just to kill that metaphor!) If we cannot rely on the "gods" of the past that were known to inspire, will any of his new ideas work?
ReplyDelete